1612 K St NW Suite 1101, Washington, DC 20006

Nationwide Case Review · 2026

Harmed by a Defective Pacemaker, ICD, or Cardiac Lead?
Cornerstone Law Can Help.

A Master Case Management Order in the District of Minnesota is compelling production of internal failure-rate data, battery-depletion analyses, and FDA communications. Motions to dismiss have been denied, and parallel state-court actions are active in California, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Cornerstone Law is reviewing cases nationwide — with no upfront cost to you.

New FDA safety alerts and expanded recalls in 2025–2026 triggered a surge in lawsuits involving pacemakers, ICDs, cardiac leads, and left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Plaintiffs allege their devices failed prematurely, delivering inappropriate shocks, losing battery power without warning, causing arrhythmias, and requiring emergency revision surgery, while manufacturers ignored early warning signs and failed to notify physicians and patients of known risks.
D. Minn. Lead coordinated proceeding, Medtronic MDL
3 Major manufacturers named (Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Sci.)
MTD Denied Core claims proceeding to discovery
3 States Parallel coordinated proceedings (CA, IL, PA)

Where the Litigation Stands Now

The lead coordinated proceeding in the District of Minnesota has issued a Master Case Management Order putting defendants on the clock to produce the internal documents at the heart of the litigation. Motions to dismiss have been denied, clearing the way for full discovery on defective design, failure to warn, and negligent post-market surveillance claims.

In re: Medtronic Cardiac Device Products Liability Litigation

Case No. 0:25-cv-01944 — District of Minnesota

Late 2025: Master Case Management Order issued requiring production of internal failure-rate data, battery-depletion analyses, lead-fracture reports, and FDA communications regarding recalls. Several motions to dismiss denied, with defective design, failure to warn, and negligent post-market surveillance claims all proceeding.

Parallel State-Court Coordinated Proceedings

California, Illinois, and Pennsylvania state courts

State-court actions in three major jurisdictions have been consolidated for coordinated discovery, expanding the overall evidentiary record and creating additional pressure on manufacturers through simultaneous proceedings on multiple fronts.

  • Internal failure-rate data — device-specific defect rates manufacturers tracked internally but didn't disclose to physicians or patients
  • Battery-depletion analyses — internal studies on premature battery failure and the timeline manufacturers knew about the risk
  • Lead-fracture reports — documentation of known lead failure patterns across device lines
  • FDA communications regarding recalls — correspondence revealing what manufacturers told regulators and when
Motions to dismiss have been denied across the board. Core claims are proceeding to full discovery in both federal and state courts. Filing now helps ensure your claim is part of the coordinated proceedings and positioned to benefit from the evidence being produced.

Which Companies and Devices Are Being Sued?

The most active litigation involves claims against the three largest cardiac device manufacturers. Lawsuits cover a wide range of implanted devices, with common threads of premature failure, inadequate warnings, and delayed recalls.

MedtronicPacemakers, ICDs, leads, LVADs
Abbott / St. JudePacemakers, ICDs, cardiac leads
Boston ScientificICDs, CRT devices, leads

What Plaintiffs Allege

Plaintiffs allege a pattern of premature device failures that put patients' lives at risk, paired with manufacturer conduct that concealed known defects and delayed corrective action.

Premature Battery Depletion

Batteries allegedly failed well before their expected lifespan, leaving patients without life-sustaining therapy, often without any warning that depletion was occurring.

Inappropriate Shocks

ICDs allegedly delivered painful, dangerous electrical shocks when none were needed, causing severe physical and psychological harm to patients.

Lead Fracture and Failure

Cardiac leads allegedly fractured or malfunctioned, interrupting therapy delivery and in some cases triggering inappropriate shocks or loss of pacing.

Arrhythmia and Cardiac Arrest

Device failures allegedly triggered dangerous arrhythmias or left patients without protection during cardiac events, resulting in cardiac arrest in the most severe cases.

Ignored Warning Signs

Plaintiffs allege manufacturers had internal data showing failure patterns and chose not to notify physicians or issue timely recalls, prolonging patient exposure to known risks.

Emergency Revision Surgery

Device failures required emergency surgical intervention to replace or remove defective components, each surgery carrying its own serious risks for cardiac patients.

Are You a Victim? Who May Qualify?

You may qualify if you received a cardiac device from one of the named manufacturers and subsequently experienced a device failure or complication requiring additional medical treatment or hospitalization.

Qualifying Device Failures

  • Device failure or malfunction
  • Lead fracture or dislodgement
  • Premature battery depletion
  • Inappropriate electrical shocks
  • Infection requiring device removal
  • Emergency revision surgery
  • Heart attack or cardiac arrest linked to device failure

General Eligibility Factors

  • Received a pacemaker, ICD, cardiac lead, or LVAD from Medtronic, Abbott/St. Jude, or Boston Scientific
  • Experienced a qualifying device failure or complication
  • Failure or complication documented in medical records
  • Required additional treatment, hospitalization, or surgery due to device failure

Liability and What You Can Recover

Liability Legal Theories

  • Defective design
  • Failure to warn
  • Negligent post-market surveillance
  • Negligent recall
  • Breach of warranty
  • Fraudulent concealment of failure data

Damages What You Can Recover

  • Medical bills (past and future)
  • Lost wages and reduced earning capacity
  • Compensation for permanent disability
  • Pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Wrongful death damages

What Patients and Families Ask Us Most

My device hasn't failed yet, but I'm worried it will — can I file now?

Claims generally require an actual failure or complication, not just a heightened risk. If your device is subject to a recall, it's still worth having your situation reviewed, since monitoring requirements or replacement surgery may factor in.

What does it cost to work with Cornerstone Law?

We handle heart device cases on contingency — no upfront fee, and we only get paid if we recover compensation for you.

My device is from a manufacturer not listed here — do I still qualify?

Medtronic, Abbott/St. Jude, and Boston Scientific make up the most active litigation, but other manufacturers' devices may also be involved as the litigation develops. Reach out and we can evaluate your specific device.

My family member passed away after a device failure — can we still file?

Yes. Surviving family members may be able to bring a wrongful death claim on the decedent's behalf. We can walk you through what that looks like in your state.

Why Cornerstone Law: We track every development in the District of Minnesota coordinated proceeding, state-court consolidated actions, and FDA recall activity, pursuing the strongest possible case for every client.

Cornerstone Law Is Reviewing Heart Device Cases Nationwide

We represent patients harmed by defective cardiac devices. Find out whether your device and complication qualify for a claim.

Get a Free Case Review

No fee unless we recover compensation for you. Call 1-800-928-9445.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any future case. This is a paid legal advertisement from Cornerstone Law, LLP. Attorney Frank Zeccola, Esq., licensed to practice law in California, is responsible for this advertisement.
Cornerstone Law Is Reviewing Heart Device Cases Free, no-obligation case review — you pay nothing unless we win.
Get Your Free Case Review