Nationwide Case Review · 2026
Used Chemical Hair Relaxers and Later Diagnosed With Cancer?
Cornerstone Law Can Help.
Over 11,500 cases are now pending in MDL 3060 in the Northern District of Illinois, one of the largest active product-liability MDLs in the country. Bellwether trials are expected in 2027. Cornerstone Law is reviewing cases nationwide — with no upfront cost to you.
Lawsuits began rapidly accelerating after scientific studies linked long-term use of chemical hair relaxers and straighteners to uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and other reproductive injuries. By May 2026, the litigation had grown into a massive federal proceeding with 11,526 cases pending, and the number continues to rise, making this one of the largest and most closely watched product-liability actions in the United States.
11,526
Cases pending in MDL 3060 (May 2026)
2027
First bellwether trials expected
N.D. Ill.
Before Judge Mary M. Rowland
4+
Qualifying cancer and injury types
Federal Litigation
The Hair Relaxer MDL: Latest DevelopmentsMDL No. 3060 — Northern District of Illinois
All federal hair relaxer cases are consolidated in MDL 3060, In re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, before Judge Mary M. Rowland. The litigation is now in a high-leverage phase: the outcomes of the Daubert challenges and bellwether trials will heavily influence future settlement values.
- Bellwether trial preparation is underway — first trials expected in 2027, which will help determine case values and shape future settlement negotiations
- Daubert (Rule 702) briefing is in progress — both sides are challenging the admissibility of expert testimony on causation, a critical issue in the litigation
- Discovery is active — depositions of bellwether plaintiffs and production of internal manufacturer documents are ongoing
- Filing pace remains strong — tens of thousands of cases are consolidated, with additional state-court filings continuing nationwide
Implicated Products
Which Products Are Involved?
The lawsuits target a wide range of chemical relaxers and straightening products. These products were often marketed for long-term, repeated use, especially to Black women and young girls, increasing cumulative exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Dark & Lovely
Just for Me
Optimum
Motions
ORS / Olive Oil
Soft & Beautiful
Girls' Hair Relaxer Lines
Eligibility
Who May Qualify for a Hair Relaxer Lawsuit?
You may qualify if you used chemical hair relaxers regularly over an extended period and were later diagnosed with a covered condition. A confirmed diagnosis and the ability to identify the brands used are required.
Qualifying Diagnoses and Injuries
- Uterine cancer
- Endometrial cancer
- Ovarian cancer
- Uterine fibroids requiring hysterectomy
Qualifying Exposure History
- Used chemical hair relaxers at least 4 times per year
- Used for one year or longer
- Can identify the brand(s) used
- Confirmed diagnosis on record
No global settlement has been announced. The litigation is actively progressing toward bellwether trials in 2027. Filing now helps ensure your claim is preserved and positioned ahead of major rulings that could affect case values.
Common Questions
What Clients Ask Us Most
I used a store brand, not one of the listed names — do I still qualify?
Many store-brand and private-label relaxers use similar chemical formulations and may still qualify. Check your product packaging or receipts, and we can help confirm eligibility.
What does it cost to work with Cornerstone Law?
We handle hair relaxer cases on contingency — no upfront fee, and we only get paid if we recover compensation for you.
Has there been a settlement yet?
Not a global one. The litigation is progressing toward bellwether trials in 2027, and settlement values are typically shaped by how those early trials go.
I no longer have the product packaging — can I still file?
Purchase receipts, photos, or even a clear memory of the brand can sometimes be enough, especially combined with your medical records. It's worth having your specific situation reviewed.
Why Cornerstone Law: We closely track every development in MDL 3060, including Daubert rulings, bellwether selections, and emerging settlement discussions, to ensure our clients receive the strongest possible representation.
Cornerstone Law Is Reviewing Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases Nationwide
We represent women who developed reproductive cancers after long-term use of chemical hair relaxers. Find out whether your diagnosis and use history qualify for a claim.
Get a Free Case Review
No fee unless we recover compensation for you. Call 1-800-928-9445.
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any future case. This is a paid legal advertisement from Cornerstone Law, LLP. Attorney Frank Zeccola, Esq., licensed to practice law in California, is responsible for this advertisement.
