1612 K St NW Suite 1101, Washington, DC 20006
1612 K St NW Suite 1101, Washington, DC 20006
Over 100 cases are coordinated in California courts, with renewed federal consolidation efforts expected. Game publishers including Epic Games, Roblox, and Activision Blizzard are accused of intentionally engineering addiction in children. Cornerstone Law is reviewing cases nationwide — with no upfront cost to you.
Litigation Status
The momentum behind these cases has accelerated significantly since 2025–2026. In May 2025, over 100 cases were formally consolidated into Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding No. 5363 (JCCP 5363) in California, creating the first large-scale coordinated docket for video game addiction claims.
In December 2025, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation considered creating a federal MDL, proposed as MDL No. 3168, but declined due to the wide range of defendants. This was a procedural denial, not a rejection of the underlying claims. Many legal observers expect renewed federal consolidation efforts as case volume grows.
Named Defendants
Lawsuits target major game publishers whose products are alleged to use manipulative design features to drive compulsive use and spending among children and teens.
Why These Lawsuits Are Being Filed
The core legal theory mirrors the social media litigation: game publishers intentionally engineered their products using manipulative design features to maximize engagement, spending, and compulsive use. These design choices weren't accidental — they were built to exploit developing brains.
Reward mechanics that mimic gambling, keeping children spending in pursuit of randomized in-game prizes.
Variable-ratio reward schedules identical to those used in slot machines, engineered to compel repeated play.
Time-limited content and seasonal events designed to create fear of missing out and prevent children from logging off.
In-game currencies that disguise the true cost of purchases, causing children and parents to lose track of real money spent.
Features that leverage peer influence and social status within games to keep children online longer and spending more.
Epic Games' $520M FTC settlement confirmed dark-pattern design and unlawful data practices, the largest gaming penalty in FTC history.
Eligibility
The World Health Organization formally recognized Gaming Disorder in ICD-11 in 2022, giving plaintiffs a clear diagnostic framework. Some lawsuits also cite neuroimaging evidence showing structural brain changes in minors exposed to prolonged gaming.
Common Questions
The named publishers represent the largest share of cases so far, but other developers using similar design mechanics may also be involved as the litigation develops. Reach out and we can evaluate your specific situation.
We handle video game addiction cases on contingency — no upfront fee, and we only get paid if we recover compensation for your family.
Not currently. A federal MDL was proposed and declined on procedural grounds in December 2025, though that doesn't affect the underlying claims. Cases are actively coordinating in California's JCCP 5363, and renewed federal consolidation efforts are expected as case volume grows.
Yes, often. Many claims are based on harm that occurred while the child was a minor, and cases can still be filed after they turn 18, subject to your state's filing deadlines.
We represent families whose children were harmed by addictive video game design. Find out whether your child's diagnosis and game use qualify for a claim.
Get a Free Case ReviewNo fee unless we recover compensation for you. Call 1-800-928-9445.